Updating data from one table to another dirty dating magazine

Rated 4.99/5 based on 719 customer reviews

I am using Table T1 to insert or update the data inthe Table T2 (which has a unique key column -c1 c2) in oracle 8.1.7. COM merge into t1 2 using t2 3 on ( t2.object_id = t1.object_id ) 4 when matched then 5 update set t1.object_name = t2.object_name 6 when not matched then 7 insert (object_id, object_name) values( t2.object_id, t2.object_name); 29317 rows merged. In my case Table T1 (staging table with 300 columns) will have 200 thousand rows every day for insert or update to thehistory table T2 ( 280 columns) that has 10 Million historical rows. May 10, 2004 - pm UTC nologging is not a hint.nologging will *never* be useful for an do realize your update sets a.mid_table_id to either: a) itself (you selected a.mid_table_id again) b) null if nothing exists in bprobably *not* what you meant?The pl/sql block first tries to insert if exception occur because of sqlcode = -1 then it knows it is for update. Either: o move the error log into an autonomous transaction o just LOSE the commit all together (without changing the outcome of your program at all!! o you hit an error on the update o you log it and commit o you subsequently (later) hit an ora-1555 on the SELECT and bump out of the loop whoops -- you processed 1/2 of the table. Since I am inserting a massive amount of data, using Merge -1.) How can I commit at every 1000 rows2.) If the row to load fails during Insert or update, can i trap that rows and put it into another table T3 .3.) How can i find out how many rows are inserted verser update.4.) Is Merge the best case in above scenario. I'll assume you *meant* b.mid_table_idas long as that column is not indexed, this won't take very long at all.update ( select a.mid_table_id a_mtid, b.mid_table_id b_mtid from big_table a, mid_table b where a.join_col = b.join_col ) set a_mtid = b_mtid;that assumes (naturally) that a primary/unique constraint exists on mid_table(join_col) -- if not, add one -- it *must be true* or the update would be ambigous (if many rows can exist in B, which one to use? Tom we have a table with the following structure :inv_id addr_1 addr_2 addr_3 addr_4 1 xxx null null yyy 2 null xxx null yyy 3 null null xxx yyy 4 null null null xxx 5 xxx null yyy null 6 xxx null yyy zzz output should be :inv_id addr_1 addr_2 addr_3 addr_4 1 xxx yyy null null 2 xxx yyy null null 3 xxx yyy null null 4 xxx null null null 5 xxx yyy null null 6 xxx yyy zzz null all Null values should move into one side, and all Not Null values should move into one side. Thanksdmv Also if your followup includes an example you want me to look at, I'll need it to have a create table, insert into statements and such that I can easily cut and paste into sqlplus myself (like I give you) in order to play with. update 2 ( 3 select id, olda, oldb, oldc, oldd, 4 a, 5 b, 6 decode(shift,0,c,d) c, 7 decode(shift,0,d,null) d 8 from ( 9 select t.*, decode(c,null,1,0) shift 10 from ( 11 select id, olda, oldb, oldc, oldd, 12 a, 13 decode(shift,0,b,1,c,2,d) b, 14 decode(shift,0,c,1,d) c, 15 decode(shift,0,d,null) d 16 from ( 17 select t.*, decode(b,null,decode(c,null,2,1),0) shift 18 from ( 19 select id, olda, oldb, oldc, oldd, 20 decode(shift,0,a,1,b,2,c,3,d) a, 21 decode(shift,0,b,1,c,2,d) b, 22 decode(shift,0,c,1,d) c, 23 decode(shift,0,d,1,null) d 24 from ( 25 select a olda, b oldb, c oldc, d oldd, t.*, decode(a,null,decode(b,null,decode(c,null,3,2),1),0) shift 26 from t 27 ) 28 ) t 29 ) 30 ) t 31 ) 32 ) 33 set olda = a, oldb = b, oldc = c, oldd = d 34 / 6 rows updated.It is best to use the above update of a JOIN if possible (optimizer has best chance of getting a good plan). then, we'll all know.(but #2 looks "wrong" if a's primary key is deptno,dname -- that means a given deptno can return many dnames and a dname many deptnos and hence the "deptno = ( select .... JOIN_COL); Now, if I do a regular simple update (like above) it takes for ever (never actualy had a chance to compleat it).It will need the primary key constraint on B though, if you do not have one BUT is unique, you can:[email protected] I can think of another instance (at least with v8.1.5) where the second example (updating the table via a subquery) works better than the first example (updating the joined tables). My last PL/SQL code was just a test as i was interested more in the performance during update, so i missed the commit point. )" would return more than one row in general leading to an error).... I have a table with about 5,000,000 records, the table have about 70 columns. I tried all kinds of variations with loading the data into collections and using index-by-varchar tables with no suceess in improving preformance by much.This works fine when I try to update all the records in tbl A, however, in this case I only have missing data which I have identified and populated in tbl B.

Oracle will return ORA-01031 (insufficient privileges). Hi Tom, I have a related question for an UPDATE - that takes unexpected long time. You said to use Oracle9I Merge statement when inserting or updating the data from a stagging table to history table. In the first table (the 5,000,000 record table) all the records will be updated. (I'll be happy with anything under 20 minutes)Thanks in advance.

But I am trapped by the method that without using cursor to achieve it. REGISTRATION(BIN, NAME, NAME_ALIAS, COR_GROUP, AUTHOBY, AUTHODATE, CG_NAME, ADD1, ADD2, ADD3, TEL1, FAX1, ADD5, ADD6, ADD7, TEL2, FAX2, ADD9, ADD10, ADD11, TEL3, FAX3, TP_TYPE, TRD_LINC, TRD_FY, TRD_AUTH, IMP_REG, EXP_REG, REG_TYPE, TIN, STATUS, PRE_BIN, DATREG, STAT_CHNG, ACT_CODE, ACT_MULT, ITEM_TYPE, OLD_ACT, APP_CAT, LCODE, ISSUE_DATE, VREG, M_POSI, MFUNC, SFUNC, LAST_USER, LAST_ACCS, TREG, PAY_FREQ, CREG, EREG, OREG, OP_BAL, OP_BAL_DT)select BIN, NAME----from VIS. REGISTRATION); RUN and Computer in BIG Busy mood(Hang). REGISTRATION(BIN, NAME, NAME_ALIAS, COR_GROUP, AUTHOBY, AUTHODATE, CG_NAME, ADD1, ADD2, ADD3, TEL1, FAX1, ADD5, ADD6, ADD7, TEL2, FAX2, ADD9, ADD10, ADD11, TEL3, FAX3, TP_TYPE, TRD_LINC, TRD_FY, TRD_AUTH, IMP_REG, EXP_REG, REG_TYPE, TIN, STATUS, PRE_BIN, DATREG, STAT_CHNG, ACT_CODE, ACT_MULT, ITEM_TYPE, OLD_ACT, APP_CAT, LCODE, ISSUE_DATE, VREG, M_POSI, MFUNC, SFUNC, LAST_USER, LAST_ACCS, TREG, PAY_FREQ, CREG, EREG, OREG, OP_BAL, OP_BAL_DT)select BIN, NAME, NAME_ALIAS,---- from VIS. d) I don't program forms -- you can try otn.- Thank u very much for ur nice reply. I plan to use RTRIM function in the WHERE clause to get specific set records and then after fetching, I’ll insert with a RTRIM on each column.

There are one column in each table, call id, to link them. REGISTRATION where not exists (select null from VIStemp. b)in privious question i told u that i am exporting incremental and edited data by using system date. In update portion i am facing another problem by ur recomended code. INSERT into abc values (RTRIM(col1), RTRIM(col2) .)There is another option where I can use SELECT RTRIM(col1), RTRIM(col2) from xxx where RTRIM(col1) = ‘yyy’ and then directly use insert into target table without RTRIM.

If you are at the conference, drop into the Groundbreaker area and say Hello. Every monththe client office is to give data(NEW & EDITED) "BY DATE RANGWISE" to the headoffice in CD. Thank u very much for ur kind & very helpful reply. Now we can update the join: update ( select a.pop, from taba a, gtt b where = ) set pop = cnt/and thats it. Hi Tom, I’m selecting approximately 1 million records from some tables and populating another set of tables.

Check out all our database development sessions at OOW19 This may seem like a simple question: Update Column a1 in Table A with all data in Column b1 in Table B. The Headoffice is merge the data into their system. For migration data first of all i create another temporary user named VISTEMP then cotinuing this kinds of codeinsert into VISTEMP. Its working very nicely.i will greateful to u forever.i was suffering by this problem for a long i am using the following /insert into VISTEMP. i could envision problems with only a second of granularity on a clock -- you could miss a record or two due to that.c) er? Here the source tables have data with leading spaces and the target data should be without spaces.

Leave a Reply